Search for: "Doe Defendant 19"
Results 1 - 20
of 10,839
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2016, 6:18 am
Actually, Padilla Does Apply to Undocumented Defendants by Daniel A. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 9:11 am
Horwitz Actually, Padilla Does Apply To Undocumented Defendants by Daniel A. [read post]
9 Oct 2021, 2:06 am
Does a Zoom Trial Violate A Defendant’s Rights? [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 3:55 pm
The post An Analytical Framework for Defending COVID-19 Claims Under LHWCA appeared first on MBLB. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 3:55 pm
The post An Analytical Framework for Defending COVID-19 Claims Under LHWCA appeared first on MBLB. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 3:56 pm
What does retributive justice mean right now, with the U.S. in the throes of the current (unnecessarily severe, wholly avoidable) COVID-19 pandemic? [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 2:55 am
Remote Trial did not Violate Defendant’s Constitutional Rights Ever since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been some discussion as to whether remote trials are in violation of a defendant’s constitutional rights. [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 1:19 pm
Because of the Covid-19 pandemic, the time between March 18 and November 9, 2020 will be "tolled. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 4:59 am
Horwitz has posted Actually, Padilla Does Apply to Undocumented Defendants (19 Harvard Latino Law Review, __ (2016 Forthcoming)) on SSRN. [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 6:15 pm
Does a similar fate await Santa Rita, after its first two positive cases? [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 6:00 am
The post What Does Texas HB 19 Mean for Truck Accident Claims? [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 2:21 am
Does 1-38, which preceded it, a number of defendants -- this time four of them known only as John Does #13, 16, 17, and 19 -- have joined together and moved to dismiss or sever due to the absence of any basis for joinder.In LaFace the Court dismissed as to all defendants other than John Doe #2.The students' brief in Arista cites LaFace.As they were in LaFace, the Arista defendants are represented by Stephen Robertson of Robertson… [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 11:32 am
Force Majeure in California: Does the COVID-19 Pandemic Qualify? [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 12:32 pm
Criminal defendants have many rights under the state and federal constitutions, but some of them have been altered or impinged by COVID-19 orders, and it is critical for people charged with criminal offenses to understand how their cases will proceed during the pandemic. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 12:22 pm
Force Majeure in California: Does the COVID-19 Pandemic Qualify? [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 3:03 am
Dec. 19, 2013). [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 4:52 pm
In light of the above, this leads to the following observations and conclusions: The elimination of Chapter 19 does not suit producers and exporters of Mexico or the United States. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 7:35 am
A defendant making use of this catch-all provision may ask a court to consider nonstatutory mitigating factors related to the dangers of COVID-19 in a custodial setting. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 11:33 am
What does this mean for you if you have a court appearance set during the closure? [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 12:42 pm
Specifically, the policy statement provides that a court may reduce a prison term if, in addition to meeting the statutory requirements, the defendant does not pose a threat to the safety of any person or the community at large. [read post]
